![]() The software does use AES commands for processors that offer hardware selection, however not AVX-512. The data we take for this test is the combined AES encrypt/decrypt performance, measured in gigabytes per second. In our AES encryption test, we used the discontinued TrueCrypt for its built-in benchmark, which tests several encryption algorithms directly in memory. Windows based devices have these options as well, often applied by BitLocker or third-party software. WinRAR is variable threaded but also susceptible to caching, so in our test we run it 10 times and take the average of the last five, leaving the test purely for raw CPU compute performance.Ī number of platforms, particularly mobile devices, are now offering encryption by default with file systems in order to protect the contents. It has no in-built test, so we run a compression over a set directory containing over thirty 60-second video files and 2000 small web-based files at a normal compression rate. The interface has not changed much, although the integration with Windows right click commands is always a plus. My compression tool of choice is often WinRAR, having been one of the first tools a number of my generation used over two decades ago. Otherwise you’re only presenting half of the picture) ![]() (Please note, if you plan to share the Compression graph, we'd appreciate it if you could please include the Decompression graph as well. As we get more results, it will be interesting to see how this plays out. There are also discussions around how the Windows Scheduler is implementing every thread. It is noted in this benchmark that the latest multi-die processors have very bi-modal performance between compression and decompression, performing well in one and badly in the other. For our test suite, we’ve pulled the latest version of the software and we run the benchmark from the command line, reporting the compression, decompression, and a combined score. Out of our compression/decompression tool tests, 7-zip is the most requested and comes with a built-in benchmark. 1080p60 HEVC at 3500 kbps variable bit rate, fast setting, main profileħ-zip v1805: Popular Open-Source Encoding Engine.1080p60 at 3500 kbps constant bit rate, faster setting, main profile.720p60 at 6000 kbps constant bit rate, fast setting, high profile.We have split Handbrake up into several tests, using a Logitech C920 1080p60 native webcam recording (essentially a streamer recording), and convert them into two types of streaming formats and one for archival. The version we use here is a pure CPU play, with common transcoding variations. The danger is always on version numbers and optimization, for example the latest versions of the software can take advantage of AVX-512 and OpenCL to accelerate certain types of transcoding and algorithms. Handbrake 1.1.0: Streaming and Archival Video TranscodingĪ popular open source tool, Handbrake is the anything-to-anything video conversion software that a number of people use as a reference point. Our encoding tasks are focused around these important scenarios, with input from the community for the best implementation of real-world testing.Īll of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench. ![]() Not only are more home users and gamers needing to convert video files into something more manageable, for streaming or archival purposes, but the servers that manage the output also manage around data and log files with compression and decompression. With the rise of streaming, vlogs, and video content as a whole, encoding and transcoding tests are becoming ever more important. Benchmarking Performance: CPU Encoding Tests ** = Old results marked were performed with the original BIOS & boost behaviour as published on 7/7.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |